Herzog Crebs LLP
Contact Menu
View Our Practice Areas

St. Louis Litigation Defense Blog

We All Must Rethink Personal Jurisdiction in Products Cases.

The U.S. Supreme Court in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746, 754 (2014), (PDF) has forced all of us to reconsider everything we thought we knew about personal jurisdiction. Daimler has had a major impact in products liability and toxic tort cases.

Briefly, Mercedes-Benz parent, Daimler AG, was sued in California for actions and injuries that occurred in Argentina. Notwithstanding undeniable significant contacts in California (2.4% of Daimler’s global sales occurred in California), the Supreme Court held there was no personal jurisdiction in California over non-resident Daimler for actions and injuries sustained in Argentina.

We All Must Rethink Personal Jurisdiction in Products Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746, 754 (2014), (PDF) has forced all of us to reconsider everything we thought we knew about personal jurisdiction. Daimler has had a major impact in products liability and toxic tort cases.

Complying With the Employer Notice Requirement of The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016

The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) expanded trade secret protections, but also created new requirements for employers to take advantage of those protections, including providing notice of the new whistleblower immunity "in any contract or agreement with an employee that governs the use of a trade secret or other confidential information" for contracts "entered into or updated after the date of enactment of the statute." Employers need to be aware of the breadth of scope of these notice requirements to ensure they receive the full benefit of the protections.

Bad Day for a Billionaire: Sculptor Prevails in Copyright Case

Gene Brockland recently won a significant victory for his client, sculptor Don Wakefield, in a major copyright infringement case. Billionaire Igor Olenicoff and his Olen Properties Corporation were originally hit with a $450,000 verdict. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has now upheld the damage award, and has ordered that the infringing copies be destroyed. 

Whether There's A Will Or No Will...There's Still A Way!

If an individual dies owning assets in her individual name without a joint owner or a designated beneficiary, probate court is generally the answer to transfer those assets to the correct beneficiaries. In Missouri, there are several types of probate proceedings available depending on the size of the deceased individual's estate (i.e. probate assets less liabilities).

Oh-Queso Who's Liable? Eastern District: Mexican Restaurant Employee Can State Claim for Workplace Negligence against Co-Employee

Written by Christian J. Bowling and Brian M. Wacker

Despite recent rulings by the Missouri Supreme Court, the issue of whether an employee may be liable in negligence to a co-employee remains hotly contested in Missouri. Plaintiffs continue to test the limits on what can substantiate such a claim. Recently, the Missouri Eastern District Court of Appeals weighed in on the issue, reversing a lower court ruling dismissing a co-employee's suit for failure to state a claim.  


How Is Copyright Protection Obtained?

The creator of an original work that is entitled to copyright protection owns the copyright as soon as the work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression. In other words, once the original work is created the copyright exists. For example, an artist has a copyright in his or her work as soon as their painting, drawing or sculpture has been created. At that point, with nothing more being done, it is not legal for anyone to copy that original work.

Unemployment Benefit Protests: Isolated Acts of Negligence Are Not "Misconduct" to Support Denial of Unemployment Benefits

Missouri employers know that the decision whether to protest an ex-employee's application for unemployment benefits can be a dicey proposition. The costs, risks and benefits of filing a protest should be weighed carefully.

Forecasting the future of asbestos claims

Asbestos-related litigation blossomed in the 1980s and has grown and evolved over the last four decades. Nearly 100 companies have filed for bankruptcy as a result of asbestos litigation, causing plaintiffs' attorneys to focus on solvent, yet peripheral new defendants.iIn the last four decades, over 10,000 different companies have been named in asbestos lawsuits.ii The average number of companies named on a single asbestos complaint in 2015 was 69.iii Although the expiration of asbestos litigation has been predicted many times since it began nearly 40 years ago, there does not appear to be a clear end in sight. Recent filing trends, new plaintiff accessibility, and medical advances (among other factors) seem to indicate that asbestos-related litigation will continue well into the next decade and beyond.

Email Us For A Response

Tell Us About Your Situation Contact Our Attorneys

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Herzog Crebs Attorneys at law

St. Louis (MO) Office
100 North Broadway
14th Floor
St Louis, MO 63102

Toll Free: 800-340-2913
Phone: 314-231-6700
Fax: 314-231-4656
St Louis Law Office Map

St. Clair County (IL) Office
5111 West Main Street
Belleville, IL 62226

Toll Free: 800-340-2913
Phone: 618-235-7656
Fax: 314-231-4656
Belleville Law Office Map

Madison County (IL) Office
103 West Vandalia Street
Suite 210
Edwardsville, IL 62025

Toll Free: 800-340-2913
Phone: 618-307-4320
Fax: 314-231-4656
Edwardsville Law Office Map